Background Obesity is a significant health risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Dyslipidemia, defined as a low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level, is associated with these risks. Recent bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices offer precise measurements of the percent body fat (PBF). We aimed to determine the association between PBF and HDL-C levels in middle-aged men in Korea.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional sstudy of men aged 40-65 years who visited a health examination center. Body composition was analyzed using BIA. Health habits were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. The participants were divided into four groups based on their PBF: group 1 (<21%), group 2 (21%–23.99%), group 3 (24%–28.99%), and group 4 (≥29%). Logistic regression was used to obtain the odds ratio (OR) between the PBF group and the low HDL-C level and adjusted for other variables.
Results In this study, 2,685 men were analyzed. The number of individuals diagnosed with low HDL-C levels increased significantly as the group-specific PBF increased. Group 4 showed a 5.5-fold greater association with low HDL-C compared to group 1 (P<0.01), whereas group 3 and group 2 showed an OR of 4.38 and 2.95 (P<0.01 and P<0.01), respectively.
Conclusion These results suggest that if middle-aged men are able to decrease their body fat by <5%, their HDL-C levels will increase. We suggest that 3%–5% PBF is a useful guideline for general body fat reduction in Korean middle- aged men in primary care.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis as a Helpful Tool in Pediatric Obesity Monitoring: A Case Report Agata Przytula, Joanna Popiolek-Kalisz Reports.2025; 8(1): 15. CrossRef
Health behaviors, lifestyle factors, and healthcare challenges in family medicine: a comprehensive review of recent evidence from Asian populations Joung Sik Son Korean Journal of Family Medicine.2025; 46(4): 215. CrossRef
Background Many studies have assessed the risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in elderly patients. However, most of these studies have focused on risk factors for ADRs, not serious ADRs (s-ADRs). s-ADRs are commonly found in hospitalized patients. s-ADRs warrant imminent but thorough investigations, given their critical impact on patient health. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to assess the associated risk factors for s-ADRs in elderly hospitalized patients.
Methods In-patients aged >65 years having ADRs during hospitalization at a university hospital in Korea between 2010 and 2012 were included. Medical professionals spontaneously reported ADRs using an electronic submission system at the study hospital. Further, all descriptions of ADRs were characterized and categorized through the screening of electronic medical records. We compared the characteristics of patients having s-ADRs with those of patients not having s-ADRs.
Results There were 353 cases of ADRs, 67 of which were s-ADRs. Patients taking more than eight concomitant drugs showed the highest odds ratio (OR, 11.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.42–42.03). The ratio of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was also significantly related to s-ADRs (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.33–5.81). The use of antibiotics (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.13–5.02) and antineoplastics (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.09–15.94) were significant risk factors.
Conclusion Our findings highlight the importance of polypharmacy. Liver function tests (AST/ALT ratio) must be monitored carefully within high-risk groups for ADRs.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effect of Epstein–Barr virus on macrophage M2/M1 migration and EphA2 expression in adverse drug reactions Ran An, Dong‐Jie Sun, Hao‐Xue Lei, Ang‐Ran He, Ying Tu, Jun‐Ting Tang The Journal of Dermatology.2025; 52(1): 87. CrossRef
Risk factors for severe adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients Nemanja Z. Petrović, Ana V. Pejčić, Miloš N. Milosavljević, Slobodan M. Janković Open Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Drug-Induced Serious Cutaneous Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Warisara Jiamsathit, Kansuda Bunarong, Sonthiya Papenkort, Anthony R. Cox, Narumol Jarernsiripornkul Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(3): 857. CrossRef
Epidemiology of reported serious adverse drug reactions due to anti-infectives using nationwide database of Thailand Sopit Sittiphan, Apiradee Lim, Haris Khurram, Nurin Dureh, Kwankamon Dittakan, Obed Kwabena Offe Amponsah PLOS ONE.2025; 20(2): e0318597. CrossRef
Potential inappropriate medications and drug–drug interactions in adverse drug reactions in the elderly: a retrospective study in a pharmacovigilance database Huaqiao Jiang, Yanhua Lin, Weifang Ren, Lina Lu, Xiaofang Tan, Xiaoqun Lv, Ning Zhang Frontiers in Pharmacology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Implementation of a line of care for older adults in a teaching hospital Lisiane Manganelli Girardi Paskulin, Roberta Rigo Dalla Corte, Helena Barreto dos Santos, Bruno Simas da Rocha, Francine Melo da Costa, Simone Augusta Finard, Tiago Oliveira Teixeira, Renato Gorga Bandeira de Mello Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Implementação da linha de cuidado à pessoa idosa em hospital escola Lisiane Manganelli Girardi Paskulin, Roberta Rigo Dalla Corte, Helena Barreto dos Santos, Bruno Simas da Rocha, Francine Melo da Costa, Simone Augusta Finard, Tiago Oliveira Teixeira, Renato Gorga Bandeira de Mello Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Drug Related Problems among Older Inpatients at a Tertiary Care Setting Porrawee Pramotesiri, Krongtong Putthipokin, Sirasa Ruangritchankul Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(6): 1638. CrossRef
Exploring the community pharmacist’s knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding adverse drug reactions and its reporting in the United Arab Emirates: a survey-based cross-sectional study Javedh Shareef, Sathvik Belagodu Sridhar, Mullaicharam Bhupathyraaj, Atiqulla Shariff, Sabin Thomas Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Severe Adverse Drug Reactions in Korean Elderly Patients Jungun Lee Korean Journal of Family Medicine.2022; 43(2): 91. CrossRef