• KAFM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

9
results for

"palliative care"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"palliative care"

Original Articles
Validation of the Simplified Palliative Prognostic Index to Predict Survival for Advanced Cancer Patients in Home Hospice Setting
Hyeon-Jeong Yang, Seok-Joon Yoon, Jong-Sung Kim, Sung-Soo Kim, Jin-Gyu Jung, Won Yoon Suh, Sami Lee, Hyun Gu Kim, Yong Woo Lee
Korean J Fam Med 2021;42(4):274-280.   Published online July 20, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.20.0160
Background
The simplified Palliative Prognostic Index (sPPI) substitutes a single item from the Communication Capacity Scale (CCS) for the delirium item of the original PPI. This study aimed to examine the validity of the sPPI for patients with advanced cancer in a home-based hospice care setting.
Methods
This study included 75 patients with advanced cancer who received home-based hospice care. We used medical records maintained by professional hospice nurses who had visited the patients in their homes. Based on their sPPI score, patients were divided into three groups—A (<4), B (≥4 and <6), and C (≥6)—to compare survival. Further, we investigated the sPPI’s accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and sensitivity and specificity for 3- and 6-week survival. We used three sPPIs including different substitutions for the delirium item (two methods using the CCS and one using the Korean Nursing Delirium Screening Scale).
Results
The median survival was 60–61 days for group A, 27–30 days for group B, and 12–16 days for group C. The difference in survival was significant (P<0.05). The AUC was 0.814–0.867 for 3-week survival and 0.736–0.779 for 6-week survival. For 3- and 6-week survival, prognostic prediction showed sensitivities of 76.2%–90.9% and 76.3%–86.8%, and specificities of 64.2%–88.7% and 51.4%–70.3%, respectively.
Conclusion
The sPPI, which is measured by professional hospice nurses, has acceptable validity to predict survival for patients with advanced cancer in a home hospice setting in South Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of Simplified Palliative Prognostic Index and Palliative Performance Scale in Patients with Advanced Cancer in a Home Palliative Care Setting
    Yusuke Hiratsuka, Sang-Yeon Suh, Seok Joon Yoon
    Journal of Palliative Care.2024; 39(3): 194.     CrossRef
  • Survival prediction in advanced cancer patients – a narrative review
    Shing Fung Lee, Charles B. Simone
    Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care.2023; 17(2): 105.     CrossRef
  • 4,213 View
  • 103 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Analysis of the Time Interval between the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment Completion and Death
Sung Yoon Joung, Chung-woo Lee, Youn Seon Choi, Seon Mee Kim, Seok Won Park, Eun Shik Mo, Jae Hyun Park, Jean Shin, Hyun Jin Lee, Hong Seok Park
Korean J Fam Med 2020;41(6):392-397.   Published online May 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.19.0077
Background
This study aimed to explore the time interval distribution pattern between the Physicians Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form completion and death at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. It also examined the association between various independent parameters and POLST form completion timing.
Methods
A total of 150 critically ill patients admitted to Korea University Guro Hospital between June 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 who completed the POLST form were retrospectively analyzed and included in this study. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and group comparisons were performed using the chi-square test for categorical variables. Fisher’s exact test was also used to compare cancer versus non-cancer groups.
Results
More than half the decedents (54.7%) completed their POLST within 15 days of death and 73.4% within 30 days. The non-cancer group had the highest percentage of patients (77.8%) who died within 15 days of POLST form completion while the colorectal (39.1%) and other cancer (37.5%) groups had the lowest (P=0.336).
Conclusion
Our findings demonstrated a current need for more explicit guidance to assist physicians with initiating more timely, proactive end-of-life discussions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An Integrative Review of the State of POLST Science: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?
    Elizabeth E. Umberfield, Matthew C. Fields, Rachel Lenko, Teryn P. Morgan, Elissa Schuler Adair, Erik K. Fromme, Hillary D. Lum, Alvin H. Moss, Neil S. Wenger, Rebecca L. Sudore, Susan E. Hickman
    Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.2024; 25(4): 557.     CrossRef
  • Discussing POLST-facilitated hospice care enrollment in patients with terminal cancer
    Ho Jung An, Hyun Jeong Jeon, Sang Hoon Chun, Hyun Ae Jung, Hee Kyung Ahn, Kyung Hee Lee, Min-ho Kim, Ju Hee Kim, Jaekyung Cheon, Su-Jin Koh
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(9): 7431.     CrossRef
  • The Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form completion: a retrospective study
    Anastasia A. Mallidou, Coby Tschanz, Elisabeth Antifeau, Kyoung Young Lee, Jenipher Kayuni Mtambo, Holly Heckl
    BMC Health Services Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,791 View
  • 90 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Validation of the Prognosis in Palliative Care Study Predictor Models in Terminal Cancer Patients
Eun-Shin Kim, Jung-Kwon Lee, Mi-Hyun Kim, Hye-Mi Noh, Yeong-Hyeon Jin
Korean J Fam Med 2014;35(6):283-294.   Published online November 21, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2014.35.6.283
Background

Prognosis in Palliative Care Study (PiPS) predictor models were developed in 2011 to estimate the survival of terminal cancer patients in the United Kingdom. The aim of this study was to validate the PiPS model for terminal cancer patients in Korea, and evaluate its value in clinical practice.

Methods

This study included 202 advanced cancer patients who were admitted to the cancer hospital's palliative care ward from November 2011 to February 2013. On admission, physicians recorded the PiPS-A, PiPS-B, and doctor's survival estimates in inpatients.

Results

The median survival across PiPS-A categories was 9, 28, and 33 days, and the median survival across PiPS-B was 9.5, 27, and 43 days. The median actual survival was 25 days; overall accuracy between the PiPS-A, PiPS-B, doctor's estimates of survival, and actual survival was 52.0%, 49.5%, and 46.5%, respectively. The PiPS-A and PiPS-B groups for survival in 'days' showed a sensitivity of 48.4% and 64.1%, and specificity of 87.7%, and 77.5%, respectively. The PiPS-A and PiPS-B groups for survival in 'weeks' showed a sensitivity of 59.2%, and 44.7%, and specificity of 61.6%, and 64.7%, respectively. The PiPS-A and PiPS-B 'months' group showed a sensitivity of 37.1% and 37.1%, and specificity of 74.9% and 78.4%, respectively. The 'weeks' and 'months' groups showed significantly prolonged survival rates than 'days' group did in both PiPS-A and PiPS-B, by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Conclusion

The PiPS predictor models effectively predicted the survival ≥14 days in terminal cancer patients, and were superior to doctor's estimates.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Validation of the prognostic model for palliative radiotherapy in older patients with cancer
    Hyojung Park
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognosis palliative care study, palliative prognostic index, palliative prognostic score and objective prognostic score in advanced cancer: a prospective comparison
    Seung Hun Lee, Jeong Gyu Lee, Young Jin Choi, Young Mi Seol, Hyojeong Kim, Yun Jin Kim, Yu Hyeon Yi, Young Jin Tak, Gyu Lee Kim, Young Jin Ra, Sang Yeoup Lee, Young Hye Cho, Eun Ju Park, Youngin Lee, Jungin Choi, Sae Rom Lee, Ryuk Jun Kwon, Soo Min Son
    BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.2024; 14(e1): e1016.     CrossRef
  • Malignancy-related ascites in palliative care units: prognostic factor analysis
    Toru Kadono, Hiroto Ishiki, Naosuke Yokomichi, Tetsuya Ito, Isseki Maeda, Yutaka Hatano, Tomofumi Miura, Jun Hamano, Takashi Yamaguchi, Ayaka Ishikawa, Yuka Suzuki, Sayaka Arakawa, Koji Amano, Eriko Satomi, Masanori Mori
    BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.2023; 13(e3): e1292.     CrossRef
  • Das LUEBECKER-Modell in der Palliativmedizin
    Andreas S. Lübbe, Frank Gieseler
    Im Fokus Onkologie.2022; 25(3): 21.     CrossRef
  • Imminent death: clinician certainty and accuracy of prognostic predictions
    Nicola White, Fiona Reid, Victoria Vickerstaff, Priscilla Harries, Christopher Tomlinson, Patrick Stone
    BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.2022; 12(e6): e785.     CrossRef
  • Onkologische Systemtherapie bei Palliativpatienten: Beendigung oder Fortführung?
    Jorge Riera Knorrenschild
    TumorDiagnostik & Therapie.2021; 42(02): 105.     CrossRef
  • The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): A prospective observational validation study of a prognostic tool with an embedded qualitative evaluation
    P. C. Stone, A. Kalpakidou, C. Todd, J. Griffiths, V. Keeley, K. Spencer, P. Buckle, D. Finlay, V. Vickerstaff, R. Z. Omar, Tim Luckett
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(4): e0249297.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic models of survival in patients with advanced incurable cancer: the PiPS2 observational study
    Patrick Stone, Anastasia Kalpakidou, Chris Todd, Jane Griffiths, Vaughan Keeley, Karen Spencer, Peter Buckle, Dori-Anne Finlay, Victoria Vickerstaff, Rumana Z Omar
    Health Technology Assessment.2021; 25(28): 1.     CrossRef
  • Deep-Learning Approach to Predict Survival Outcomes Using Wearable Actigraphy Device Among End-Stage Cancer Patients
    Tien Yun Yang, Pin-Yu Kuo, Yaoru Huang, Hsiao-Wei Lin, Shwetambara Malwade, Long-Sheng Lu, Lung-Wen Tsai, Shabbir Syed-Abdul, Chia-Wei Sun, Jeng-Fong Chiou
    Frontiers in Public Health.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validation of the Palliative Prognostic Index, Performance Status–Based Palliative Prognostic Index and Chinese Prognostic Scale in a home palliative care setting for patients with advanced cancer in China
    Jun Zhou, Sitao Xu, Ziye Cao, Jing Tang, Xiang Fang, Ling Qin, Fangping Zhou, Yuzhen He, Xueren Zhong, Mingcai Hu, Yan Wang, Fengjuan Lu, Yongzheng Bao, Xiangheng Dai, Qiang Wu
    BMC Palliative Care.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A non-lab nomogram of survival prediction in home hospice care patients with gastrointestinal cancer
    Muqing Wang, Xubin Jing, Weihua Cao, Yicheng Zeng, Chaofen Wu, Weilong Zeng, Wenxia Chen, Xi Hu, Yanna Zhou, Xianbin Cai
    BMC Palliative Care.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • PALLIA‐10, a screening tool to identify patients needing palliative care referral in comprehensive cancer centers: A prospective multicentric study (PREPA‐10)
    Yann Molin, Caroline Gallay, Julien Gautier, Audrey Lardy‐Cleaud, Romaine Mayet, Marie‐Christine Grach, Gérard Guesdon, Géraldine Capodano, Olivier Dubroeucq, Carole Bouleuc, Nathalie Bremaud, Anne Fogliarini, Aline Henry, Nathalie Caunes‐Hilary, Stéphani
    Cancer Medicine.2019; 8(6): 2950.     CrossRef
  • Experiences and Opinions Related to End-of-Life Discussion: From Oncologists' and Resident Physicians' Perspectives
    Su-Jin Koh, Shinmi Kim, JinShil Kim, Bhumsuk Keam, Dae Seog Heo, Kyung Hee Lee, Bong-Seog Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Hye Jung Chang, Sun Kyung Baek
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(2): 614.     CrossRef
  • Effects of a new medical insurance payment system for hospice patients in palliative care programs in Korea
    Youngin Lee, Seung Hun Lee, Yun Jin Kim, Sang Yeoup Lee, Jeong Gyu Lee, Dong Wook Jeong, Yu Hyeon Yi, Young Jin Tak, Hye Rim Hwang, Mieun Gwon
    BMC Palliative Care.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): study protocol for a multi-centre, prospective, observational, cohort study
    Anastasia K. Kalpakidou, Chris Todd, Vaughan Keeley, Jane Griffiths, Karen Spencer, Victoria Vickerstaff, Rumana Z. Omar, Patrick Stone
    BMC Palliative Care.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Integration of oncology and palliative care: a Lancet Oncology Commission
    Stein Kaasa, Jon H Loge, Matti Aapro, Tit Albreht, Rebecca Anderson, Eduardo Bruera, Cinzia Brunelli, Augusto Caraceni, Andrés Cervantes, David C Currow, Luc Deliens, Marie Fallon, Xavier Gómez-Batiste, Kjersti S Grotmol, Breffni Hannon, Dagny F Haugen, I
    The Lancet Oncology.2018; 19(11): e588.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Patient Discharge Status Based on Indicators on Admission
    Sung-In Chung, Seung Hun Lee, Yun-Jin Kim, Sang-Yeoup Lee, Jeong-Gyu Lee, Yu-Hyeon Yi, Young-Hye Cho, Young-Jin Tak, Hye-Rim Hwang, Eun-Ju Park, Kyung-Mi Kim
    The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2018; 21(3): 75.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Tools in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Claribel P.L. Simmons, Donald C. McMillan, Kerry McWilliams, Tonje A. Sande, Kenneth C. Fearon, Sharon Tuck, Marie T. Fallon, Barry J. Laird
    Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2017; 53(5): 962.     CrossRef
  • A systematically structured review of biomarkers of dying in cancer patients in the last months of life; An exploration of the biology of dying
    Victoria Louise Reid, Rachael McDonald, Amara Callistus Nwosu, Stephen R. Mason, Chris Probert, John E. Ellershaw, Séamus Coyle, Shian-Ying Sung
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(4): e0175123.     CrossRef
  • Survival prediction for advanced cancer patients in the real world: A comparison of the Palliative Prognostic Score, Delirium-Palliative Prognostic Score, Palliative Prognostic Index and modified Prognosis in Palliative Care Study predictor model
    Mika Baba, Isseki Maeda, Tatsuya Morita, Satoshi Inoue, Masayuki Ikenaga, Yoshihisa Matsumoto, Ryuichi Sekine, Takashi Yamaguchi, Takeshi Hirohashi, Tsukasa Tajima, Ryohei Tatara, Hiroaki Watanabe, Hiroyuki Otani, Chizuko Takigawa, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Hiro
    European Journal of Cancer.2015; 51(12): 1618.     CrossRef
  • 5,455 View
  • 50 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref
The Association between Phase Angle of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Survival Time in Advanced Cancer Patients: Preliminary Study
So Yeon Lee, Yong Joo Lee, Jung-Hwa Yang, Chul-Min Kim, Whan-Seok Choi
Korean J Fam Med 2014;35(5):251-256.   Published online September 24, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2014.35.5.251
Background

A frequent manifestation of advanced cancer patients is malnutrition, which is correlated with poor prognosis and high mortality. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is an easy-to-use and non-invasive technique to evaluate changes in body composition and nutritional status. We investigated BIA-derived phase angle as a prognostic indicator for survival in advanced cancer patients.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients treated at the hospice center of Seoul St. Mary's Hospital underwent BIA measurements from January, 2013 to May, 2013. We also evaluated palliative prognostic index (PPI) and palliative performance scale to compare with the prognostic value of phase angle. Cox's proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate the prognostic effect of phase angle. The Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate survival.

Results

Using univariate Cox analysis, phase angle (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61/per degree increase; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.89; P = 0.010), PPI (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.47; P = 0.048) were found to be significantly associated with survival. Adjusting age, PPI, body mass index, phase angle significantly showed association with survival in multivariate analysis (HR, 0.64/per degree increase; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.95; P = 0.028). Survival time of patients with phase angle ≥ 4.4° was longer than patients with phase angle < 4.4° (log rank, 6.208; P-value = 0.013).

Conclusion

Our data suggest BIA-derived phase angle may serve as an independent prognostic indicator in advanced cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic utility of Palliative Prognostic Index in advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Si Qi Yoong, Hui Zhang, Dee Whitty, Wilson Wai San Tam, Wenru Wang, Davina Porock
    Palliative and Supportive Care.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mortality Outcomes and Contributing Risk Factors in Patients with Hospital-Associated Disability
    Soo-Jeong Jo, So-Hee Lee, Hyo-Jin Min, Hee-Ji Kim, Hyun-Ho Kong
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(16): 4798.     CrossRef
  • Phase angle as a prognostic factor in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the existing evidence via a meta-analysis
    Qianran Kong, Lijuan Tian, Yihan Wang, Min Yu
    Nutrición Hospitalaria.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Expert Consensus on Morphofunctional Assessment in Disease-Related Malnutrition. Grade Review and Delphi Study
    José Manuel García-Almeida, Cristina García-García, María D. Ballesteros-Pomar, Gabriel Olveira, Juan J. Lopez-Gomez, Virginia Bellido, Irene Bretón Lesmes, Rosa Burgos, Alejandro Sanz-Paris, Pilar Matia-Martin, Francisco Botella Romero, Julia Ocon Breton
    Nutrients.2023; 15(3): 612.     CrossRef
  • Phase angle and extracellular water-to-total body water ratio estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis are associated with levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit in patients with diabetes
    Taiki Hori, Shingen Nakamura, Hiroki Yamagami, Saya Yasui, Minae Hosoki, Tomoyo Hara, Yukari Mitsui, Shiho Masuda, Kiyoe Kurahashi, Sumiko Yoshida, Takeshi Harada, Akio Kuroda, Toshiki Otoda, Tomoyuki Yuasa, Itsuro Endo, Munehide Matsuhisa, Masahiro Abe,
    Heliyon.2023; 9(4): e14724.     CrossRef
  • Phase angle as a marker of outcome in hospitalized pediatric patients. A systematic review of the evidence (GRADE) with meta-analysis
    Rocío Fernández-Jiménez, Rafael Martín-Masot, Isabel Cornejo-Pareja, Isabel M. Vegas-Aguilar, Marta Herrador-López, Francisco J. Tinahones, Víctor Manuel Navas-López, Diego Bellido-Guerrero, José Manuel García-Almeida
    Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.2023; 24(4): 751.     CrossRef
  • Routine cancer treatments and their impact on physical function, symptoms of cancer-related fatigue, anxiety, and depression
    Niklas Paul Grusdat, Alexander Stäuber, Marion Tolkmitt, Jens Schnabel, Birgit Schubotz, Peter Richard Wright, Henry Schulz
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(5): 3733.     CrossRef
  • Effect of exercise on phase angle in cancer patients: a systematic review
    Alexandre D. MARTINS, Rafael OLIVEIRA, João P. BRITO, Tiago COSTA, Júlia SILVA, Fátima RAMALHO, Rita SANTOS-ROCHA, Nuno PIMENTA
    The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Role of Standardized Phase Angle in the Assessment of Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Nan Jiang, Jiaxin Zhang, Siming Cheng, Bing Liang
    Nutrients.2022; 15(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between Phase Angle and Objective and Subjective Indicators of Nutritional Status in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
    Carolina de Almeida, Paula Moreira Penna, Solange Silveira Pereira, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa Rosa, Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini
    Nutrition and Cancer.2021; 73(11-12): 2201.     CrossRef
  • Is phase angle a valuable prognostic tool in cancer patients' survival? A systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature
    Arman Arab, Elham Karimi, Kristina Vingrys, Fatemeh Shirani
    Clinical Nutrition.2021; 40(5): 3182.     CrossRef
  • Phase angle cutoff value as a marker of the health status and functional capacity in breast cancer survivors
    Alexandre D. Martins, Rafael Oliveira, João Paulo Brito, Tiago Costa, Fátima Ramalho, Nuno Pimenta, Rita Santos-Rocha
    Physiology & Behavior.2021; 235: 113400.     CrossRef
  • Phase angle assessment by electrical vector bioimpedance in women with cervical cancer
    Nadia Denisse Ramírez Martínez, Verónica Gallegos García, Darío Gaytán Hernández, Pablo Zermeño Ugalde, Jaime Arturo Guel Pañola
    Nutrición Hospitalaria.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Trunk Skeletal Muscle Mass and Phase Angle Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis are Associated with the Chance of Femoral Neck Fracture in Very Elderly People


    Jia Chen, Kai Lu, Hong Chen, Ning Hu, Jie Chen, Xi Liang, Jian Qin, Wei Huang
    Clinical Interventions in Aging.2020; Volume 15: 889.     CrossRef
  • Phase Angle as a Marker of Muscular Strength in Breast Cancer Survivors
    Catarina N. Matias, Joana Cavaco-Silva, Mafalda Reis, Francesco Campa, Stefania Toselli, Luís Sardinha, Analiza M. Silva
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(12): 4452.     CrossRef
  • The clinical and cost-effectiveness of supplemental parenteral nutrition in oncology
    Neil Webb, Julie Fricke, Elizabeth Hancock, David Trueman, Srobana Ghosh, Julie Winstone, Alec Miners, Julian Shepelev, Juan W. Valle
    ESMO Open.2020; 5(3): e000709.     CrossRef
  • Phase angle and mortality: a systematic review
    Luíza M. Garlini, Fernanda D. Alves, Luciane B. Ceretta, Ingrid S. Perry, Gabriela C. Souza, Nadine O. Clausell
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2019; 73(4): 495.     CrossRef
  • Physical training over 6 months is associated with improved changes in phase angle, body composition, and blood glucose in healthy young males
    Raquel D. Langer, Analiza M. Silva, Juliano H. Borges, Vagner X. Cirolini, Mauro A. Páscoa, Gil Guerra‐Júnior, Ezequiel M. Gonçalves
    American Journal of Human Biology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of body composition in oncologic patients: Experimental survey on the role of bioimpedentiometric analysis
    Maria Alessandra Gammone, Cristiana Ficoneri, Nicolantonio D’Orazio
    Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance.2019; 10(1): 90.     CrossRef
  • Phase Angle and the Diagnosis of Impending Death in Patients with Advanced Cancer: Preliminary Findings
    David Hui, Jessica Moore, Minjeong Park, Diane Liu, Eduardo Bruera
    The Oncologist.2019; 24(6): e365.     CrossRef
  • Different nutritional assessment tools as predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection
    Sílvia Fernandes Maurício, Jingjie Xiao, Carla M. Prado, Maria Cristina Gonzalez, Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia
    Clinical Nutrition.2018; 37(5): 1505.     CrossRef
  • Bioelectrical Impedance Phase Angle as an Indicator of Malnutrition in Hospitalized Children with Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Diseases—A Case Control Study
    Paweł Więch, Mariusz Dąbrowski, Dariusz Bazaliński, Izabela Sałacińska, Bartosz Korczowski, Monika Binkowska-Bury
    Nutrients.2018; 10(4): 499.     CrossRef
  • Phase angle assessment in critically ill cancer patients: Relationship with the nutritional status, prognostic factors and death
    Tatiana Cathoud do Amaral Paes, Kátia Cansanção Correa de Oliveira, Patrícia de Carvalho Padilha, Wilza Arantes Ferreira Peres
    Journal of Critical Care.2018; 44: 430.     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Role of Phase Angle in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
    Mayane Marinho Esteves Pereira, Mariana dos Santos Campello Queiroz, Nathália Masiero Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, Juliana Rodrigues, Emanuelly Varea Maria Wiegert, Larissa Calixto‐Lima, Livia Costa de Oliveira
    Nutrition in Clinical Practice.2018; 33(6): 813.     CrossRef
  • Phase Angle Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Predicting Survival in Patients with Metastatic Cancer
    Sung-soo Yoon, Seong-woo Yoon, Han-sung Ryu, Eun-hye Kim, Jee-young Lee
    The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine.2018; 39(4): 463.     CrossRef
  • Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Combined With Individualized Nutritional Support Improves Body Composition in Patients With Hematological Malignancies – A Pilot Study
    Kristin Schink, Dejan Reljic, Hans J. Herrmann, Julia Meyer, Andreas Mackensen, Markus F. Neurath, Yurdagül Zopf
    Frontiers in Physiology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Body composition and phase angle as an indicator of nutritional status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    Paweł Więch, Izabela Sałacińska, Dariusz Bazaliński, Mariusz Dąbrowski
    Pediatric Rheumatology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nutritional Assessment of Dialysis Patient with a Web-Based Tool Allows More Accurate Treatment of Malnutrition
    Mihela Ferlinc, Bojan Knap
    PRILOZI.2018; 39(2-3): 37.     CrossRef
  • Nutritional and functional factors as prognostic of surgical cancer patients
    Jéssica Härter, Silvana Paiva Orlandi, Maria Cristina Gonzalez
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2017; 25(8): 2525.     CrossRef
  • Physical condition, nutritional status, fatigue, and quality of life in oncological out-patients
    Karl-Heinz Schulz, Stefan Patra, Hannah Spielmann, Silke Klapdor, Kathrin Schlüter, Sandra van Eckert
    SAGE Open Medicine.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment and Impact of Phase Angle and Sarcopenia in Palliative Cancer Patients
    Dana A. Pérez Camargo, Silvia R. Allende Pérez, Emma Verastegui Avilés, Mónica M. Rivera Franco, Abelardo Meneses García, Ángel Herrera Gómez, Víctor I. Urbalejo Ceniceros
    Nutrition and Cancer.2017; 69(8): 1227.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of adult malnutrition and prognosis with bioelectrical impedance analysis
    Henry C. Lukaski, Ursula G. Kyle, Jens Kondrup
    Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care.2017; 20(5): 330.     CrossRef
  • Phase Angle of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis as Prognostic Factor in Palliative Care Patients at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico
    Dana A. Pérez Camargo, Silvia R. Allende Pérez, Mónica M. Rivera Franco, Nelson E. Álvarez Licona, Víctor I. Urbalejo Ceniceros, Lilian E. Figueroa Baldenegro
    Nutrition and Cancer.2017; 69(4): 601.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Multi-frequency Phase Angle and Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer
    David Hui, Rony Dev, Lindsay Pimental, Minjeong Park, Maria A. Cerana, Diane Liu, Eduardo Bruera
    Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2017; 53(3): 571.     CrossRef
  • Change in Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) Predicts Survival in Patients with Terminal Cancer
    Jee Hye Oh, Yong Joo Lee, Min Seok Seo, Jo Hi Yoon, Chul Min Kim, Chung Kang
    The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2017; 20(4): 235.     CrossRef
  • A Comprehensive Review of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Other Methods in the Assessment of Nutritional Status in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
    Halina Cichoż-Lach, Agata Michalak
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • Cereals and pulse-based ready-to-use therapeutic food as an alternative to the standard milk- and peanut paste–based formulation for treating severe acute malnutrition: a noninferiority, individually randomized controlled efficacy clinical trial
    Paluku Bahwere, Bisimwa Balaluka, Jonathan CK Wells, Chobohwa N Mbiribindi, Kate Sadler, Peter Akomo, Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet, Steve Collins
    The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2016; 103(4): 1145.     CrossRef
  • Interference of heart and transcutaneous oxygen monitoring in the measurement of bioelectrical impedance analysis in preterm newborns
    Viviane C. Comym, Yuri S. Macedu, Eduardo K.P.B. Neves, Arnaldo C. Bueno, Herminia C. Fernandez, Maria E.L. Moreira, Alan A. Vieira
    Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português).2016; 92(5): 528.     CrossRef
  • Interference of heart and transcutaneous oxygen monitoring in the measurement of bioelectrical impedance analysis in preterm newborns
    Viviane C. Comym, Yuri S. Macedu, Eduardo K.P.B. Neves, Arnaldo C. Bueno, Herminia C. Fernandez, Maria E.L. Moreira, Alan A. Vieira
    Jornal de Pediatria.2016; 92(5): 528.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of phase angle in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure
    Fernanda Donner Alves, Gabriela Corrêa Souza, Nadine Clausell, Andréia Biolo
    Clinical Nutrition.2016; 35(6): 1530.     CrossRef
  • Capacitance of Membrane As a Prognostic Indicator of Survival in Head and Neck Cancer
    Teresa Małecka-Massalska, Radosław Mlak, Agata Smoleń, Anna Brzozowska, Wojciech Surtel, Kamal Morshed, Shian-Ying Sung
    PLOS ONE.2016; 11(11): e0165809.     CrossRef
  • The value of bioelectrical impedance analysis and phase angle in the evaluation of malnutrition and quality of life in cancer patients—a comprehensive review
    O Grundmann, S L Yoon, J J Williams
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2015; 69(12): 1290.     CrossRef
  • 5,111 View
  • 75 Download
  • 40 Web of Science
  • 42 Crossref
The Realities and Associated Factors of Palliative Chemotherapy Near the End of Life in the Patients Enrolled in Palliative Care Unit
Daeun Jung, Sunjin Hwang, Hyun Jung You, Jungkwon Lee
Korean J Fam Med 2012;33(1):44-50.   Published online January 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2012.33.1.44
Background

It is important to know and decide when to end regimen for the quality of life of the patients. However, there is currently no clear agreement on when to terminate palliative chemotherapy. We investigated the duration between the last chemotherapy and death, and associated factors affecting patients receiving palliative care after the last chemotherapy.

Methods

We studied 242 patients who were put into palliative care ward after receiving chemotherapy and died during hospitalization from 2008 to 2009. Electronic medical records were used to gather information on demographic characteristics, types of primary cancer, and palliative chemotherapy. Then we analyzed the relationship between the clinical characteristics of patients and interval between last chemotherapy and death.

Results

The average survival time of patients after referral to palliative care was 17.5 days; survival time after discontinuation of chemotherapy was 103 days. Also, 104 (43.0%) patients died within 3 months and 14 (5.8%) patients died within 1 month of persistent palliative chemotherapy. Chemotherapy on patients within 3 months from their death was not associated with the social characteristics of the population.

Conclusion

The patients who were referred to palliative care were found to have continued to receive chemotherapy within 3 months before death. However, only a small number of patients received chemotherapy within 1 month before death, which confirms that futile chemotherapy that extends to the end of life was less frequent. Doctors should be able to recognize the implications of excessive and aggressive use of chemotherapy and should actively communicate with patients about therapeutic choices.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Palliative chemotherapy for breast cancer: A population‐based cohort study of emergency hospital admissions and place of death
    Chloe J. Bright, Casey Dunlop, Cong Chen, Rebecca Smittenaar, Sean McPhail, Georgina Hanbury, David Dodwell, Kathy Pritchard‐Jones, Mick Peake, Emma Kipps
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 5,704 View
  • 20 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Validation of Scoring System for Survival Prediction in Terminal Cancer Patients in Korea.
In Chul Lee, Chan Kyong Kim, Sang Yeon Suh, Young Sung Kim, Kyung Hee Cho, Hee Cheol Kang, Bang Bu Youn
J Korean Acad Fam Med 2007;28(9):682-689.   Published online September 10, 2007
Background
Accurate prediction of survival in terminal cancer patients is important for planning effective palliative care. But, the prediction of survival most often relies on the physicians' prediction. Recently, simple prognostic scores such as Palliative Prognostic Index and Palliative Prognostic Score have been developed to estimate duration of survival. The aim of this study was to validate these prognostic scores and physicians' prediction for terminally ill cancer patients in Korea to determine its value in clinical practice. Methods: The subjects of this study were 40 terminal cancer inpatients of one hospital who died between March to May 2005. All patients' Palliative Prognostic Index, Palliative Prognostic Score, and physicians' prediction were recorded on admission by a physician. Results: When a Palliative Prognostic Index of more than 6 was adopted as a cut-off point 3 weeks' survival was predicted with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 60%. When the three groups were grouped by Palliative Prognostic Scores (group A: ≤5.5, group B: 5.6∼11, group C: >11), the 30 day survival probability were 60% for group A, 16.7% for group B, and 4.3% for group C, respectively. Physicians' prediction showed moderate correlation (correlation coefficient=0.604) with actual survival and had a tendency to overestimate survival. Conclusion: Palliative Prognostic Index was proved to be a reliable survival prediction tool in Korea. Palliative Prognostic Score had a tendency to overestimate survival as compared with other studies. Physicians' prediction had a correlation with actual survival, and it was presumed to be more accurate when combined with other prognostic score. (J Korean Acad Fam Med 2007;28: 682-689)
  • 1,644 View
  • 40 Download
Home-based Hospice-palliative Care Service Administered by University-based Family Practice.
Seok Hoon Kang, Ha Young Lee, Jun Su Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, Hwa Kyung Jung
J Korean Acad Fam Med 2006;27(11):889-894.   Published online November 10, 2006
Background
: Systematic care is not well provided in patients with terminal cancer and their families in Korea. Unnecessary hospitalization, multiple emergency room visits for controlling acute symptoms and the use of unqualified alternative care services are typical health care utilization patterns in such patients. We operated home-based hospice-palliative care services to help these patients and their families at a university-based family practice setting. Our experience is presented for the development of care model of hospice-palliative care services.

Methods : We investigated the demographic characteristics, the clinical findings and the utilization of medical care services of 72 terminally ill cancer patients before and after enrollment to hospice-palliative care unit from April 25, 2003 to April 21, 2005.

Results : The frequency of emergency room visits and the number of hospitalizations were decreased by Wicoxon Signed Ranks Test after the enrollment to home-based hospice-palliative care service unit. The duration of emergency room visits decreased from 7.7 hours to 0.3 hours and the duration of hospitalization decreased from 6.5 days to 0.0 days in median. The cost per emergency room visits decreased from 268,801 won to 153,816 won and the cost per hospitalization decreased from 285,491 won to 106,294 won in median.

Conclusion : Home-based hospice-palliative care services can be an efficient and effective model for the care of terminally ill cancer patients at a low cost.
  • 1,652 View
  • 30 Download
The Establishment of Hospice and Palliative Care System from the Cancer Patients and Families' Point of View.
Young Ho Yun, Young Sun Rhee, Jung Suk Lee, Chang Geol Lee, Si Young Kim, Eun Young Jung, Dae Seog Heo, Jun Suk Kim, Keun Seok Lee, Young Seon Hong
J Korean Acad Fam Med 2002;23(8):1042-1051.   Published online August 10, 2002
Background
: Many terminal cancer patients and families are affected with physical, emotional, and social problems. Many people claim that a type of medical services is needed to manage them such as hospice·palliative care. There have not been many studies of cancer patients and families with respect to their opinions and attitudes on hospice·palliative care for terminal cancer patients, although their views on it is important.

Methods : We surveyed 687 in-patients, out-patients and their families with cancer in 8 hospitals. The self-administered questionnaires included the following; 1) socio-demographic and clinical variables; 2) opinions on hospice·palliative care; 3) attitudes on ethical issues associated with hospice·palliative care; 4) factors associated with withholding futile care at the end-of-life. The data were analyzed with x2-test, Mantel-Haenszel x2-test, and multiple logistic regression.

Results : Almost 90% of the subjects agreed to the need of obtaining hospice·palliative care with health care insurances and reaching a social consensus on the contents of its programs. Five hundred and seventy six (83.8%) subjects agreed to the need of using advanced directives. Two hundred and eighty five (72.2%) cancer patients and 200 (68.5%) families agreed to the need of withholding futile care at the end-of-life and of people accepting their cancer diagnosis with insight and living in the metropolis as they were more likely to do. In the multivariate analysis, the attitudes on withholding futile care at the end-of-life was significantly different only by insight of cancer diagnosis (OR; 1.09∼3.15).

Conclusion : This study showed that hospice·palliative care should be established through social consensus on the issues related to ethics and insurances, and that cancer patients and families must have a right to choose such services with informed decision-making.
  • 1,420 View
  • 22 Download
Attitude of cancer patients, their primary care givers and doctors toward end-of-life care.
Jae Yong Shim, Youn Seon Choi, Yong Joon Kang, Hyun Sang Cho, Hang Suk Cho
J Korean Acad Fam Med 2000;21(4):489-497.   Published online April 1, 2000
Background
: Decision about life sustaining treatments ought to be based on the patient’s in formed preferences. This study was to see if there were any differences in acceptance by patients, their primary care givers and doctors for end-of-life care according to situations, and if any, to analyse the factors related with different attitudes.

Methods : A structured questionnaire survey of end-of-life care preferences was performed on 162 cancer patients and their primary care givers in four university hospitals and one general hospital from March 1, 1999 to February 29, 2000. A similar survey was done for doctors practicing at the above, hospitals during the same period to investigate their attitudes toward providing end-of-life care to an assumed nearly bed ridden patients. ANOVA, t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare acceptance of intervention among the groups or according to the various situations. Factors presumed to be related to the acceptance were sought and analysed by stepwise multiple regression.

Results : The difference in acceptance of intervention between the primary care giver group and the doctor group was not significant in almost every situation, showing significantly higher than the patient group(P=0.001). All three groups showed higher acceptance when a therapeutic intervention rather than a diagnostic test was proposed(P=0.001). When expected survival was 30 days rather than 7 (P=0.01), and when the therapeutic intervention was thought as non-invasive rather than invasive (P=0.001). The less anxious the patient was , the higher the acceptance. From the patient. Patients with a religion had higher acceptance rate than non-religious patients. Primary care givers who expected sure of the disease accepted more of the postulated care than those who did not (P<0.05). Wives of mother-in-laws of patients showed lower acceptance than those in other relationship(P<0.05). The longer the patient had been diagnosed with cancer, the higher the acceptance of the primary care giver (P<0.1). Direct relatives showed higher acceptance than that of collaterals(P<0.01). Family doctors specializing in family medicine had lower acceptance than doctors of other specialties and interns(P<0.05)

Conclusion : The acceptance of intervention by patients was lower than that of primary care givers and doctors and depended on the expected survival and the type, of intervention.
  • 1,195 View
  • 14 Download
TOP