• KAFM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Articles

Editorial

Efficacy versus Effectiveness

Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2013;34(4):227-227.
Published online: July 24, 2013

Department of Family Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Copyright © 2013 The Korean Academy of Family Medicine

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 7,992 Views
  • 138 Download
  • 24 Crossref
  • 33 Scopus
next
Archie Cochrane, British famous clinical epidemiologist, defined two concepts related to assessing healthcare interventions. Efficacy is the extent to which an intervention does more good than harm under ideal circumstances. Effectiveness assesses whether an intervention does more good than harm when provided under usual circumstances of healthcare practice.1)
Research on efficacy and effectiveness has also been described as explanatory and pragmatic trials. When defining the research question, it must be considered whether one asking a pragmatic or an explanatory question. This will have important implications for study design.2) Pragmatic research assesses whether an intervention works under real-life conditions and whether it works in terms that matter to the patient. Explanatory research assesses whether an intervention works under ideal or selected conditions. The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory research is important because it will determine key methodological issues relating to patient selection, definition of the intervention and controls, use of blinding and placebos, choice of outcome measure, and type of analysis.3)
Efficacy studies are frequently conducted in large tertiary care, referral settings, which tend to have more specialized clinicians and better technical equipment than primary care facilities. For effectiveness trials, settings should reflect the initial care facilities available to a diverse population with the condition of interest. Therefore, populations in primary care may be an adequate subject group for effectiveness studies.4)
The Korean Journal of Family Medicine (KJFM) publishes research and reviews related to primary care, and those related to clinical and epidemiological health services. This means that the KJFM is focused primarily on the publication of effectiveness research. The distinctions between pragmatic and explanatory research pertain to patient selection, definition of the intervention and controls, and choice of outcome measure. Effectiveness research has several characteristics: 1) patient selection should reflect routine practice; 2) the intervention should be provided by normal staff with routine training; 3) the control may therefore be routine practice rather than a placebo; 4) outcome measures are usually patient centered and incorporate broad measures of health-related quality of life.5) The editorial board, reviewer, and authors must all have such an understanding to achieve the aims and scope of the KJFM.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • 1. Haynes B. Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? The testing of healthcare interventions is evolving. BMJ 1999;319:652-653. PMID: 10480802.
  • 2. Roland M, Torgerson DJ. What are pragmatic trials? BMJ 1998;316:285PMID: 9472515.
  • 3. The College of Emergency Medicine. Pragmatic versus explanatory trials [Internet]. London: The College of Emergency Medicine; [cited 2013 Jun 29]. Available from: http://www.collemergencymed.ac.uk/CEM/Research/technical_guide/pragex.htm
  • 4. Gartlehner G, Hansen RA, Nissman D, Lohr KN, Carey TS. A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1040-1048. PMID: 16980143.
  • 5. Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:464-475. PMID: 19348971.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Effectiveness During 12-Month Adjunctive Brivaracetam Treatment in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in a Real-Life Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study in Europe
      Bernhard J. Steinhoff, Jakob Christensen, Colin P. Doherty, Marian Majoie, Anne-Liv Schulz, Fiona Brock, Dimitrios Bourikas, Iryna Leunikava, Anna Kelemen, Eduardo Rubio-Nazabal
      Neurology and Therapy.2025; 14(2): 627.     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of a web-enabled psychoeducational resource for postpartum depression and anxiety among women in British Columbia
      Claire G Lawrence, Genevieve Breau, Lily Yang, Orli S Hellerstein, Catriona Hippman, Andrea L Kennedy, Deirdre Ryan, Barbara Shulman, Lori A Brotto
      Archives of Women's Mental Health.2024; 27(6): 995.     CrossRef
    • Codesign principles for the effective development of digital heritage extended reality systems for health interventions in rural communities
      Alejandro Veliz Reyes, Marius N. Varga, Hannah Bradwell, Rory Baxter, Ray B. Jones, Daniel Maudlin
      CoDesign.2024; 20(2): 295.     CrossRef
    • Bitesize Epidemiology for General Awareness of All Students - I
      Shinjini Bandopadhyay, Angana Das Gupta, Asesh Banerjee, Prabuddha Gupta
      Resonance.2023; 28(3): 411.     CrossRef
    • Bitesize Epidemiology for General Awareness of All Students — II
      Shinjini Bandopadhyay, Angana Das Gupta, Asesh Banerjee, Prabuddha Gupta
      Resonance.2023; 28(4): 613.     CrossRef
    • Implementing Affordable Socially Assistive Pet Robots in Care Homes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stratified Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial and Mixed Methods Study
      Hannah Bradwell, Katie J Edwards, Rhona Winnington, Serge Thill, Victoria Allgar, Ray B Jones
      JMIR Aging.2022; 5(3): e38864.     CrossRef
    • Addressing the Behavioral Health Needs of Sexual and Gender Minorities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Review of the Expanding Role of Digital Health Technologies
      Emile Whaibeh, Emily L. Vogt, Hossam Mahmoud
      Current Psychiatry Reports.2022; 24(9): 387.     CrossRef
    • An Overview of the Methodologies and the Quality of Studies on Pharmacotherapy for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia
      Renata Ferraz Figueiredo, Alana Teles Costa, Rafaella de Oliveira Santos Silva, Tatiana Damasceno da Silva, Thaciana dos Santos Alcântara, Divaldo Pereira de Lyra Junior, Cristiani Isabel Banderó Walker
      Current Rheumatology Reviews.2022; 18(4): 305.     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of the Non‐Medical Surgical Assistant measured by patient outcome assessment
      Toni Hains, David Rowell, Haakan Strand
      International Journal of Nursing Practice.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Comparison of the outcomes of the prolonged antianginal therapy use in stable coronary artery disease patients according to the data of randomized and observational studies
      S.Yu. Martsevich, Yu.V. Lukina, N.P. Kutishenko, Yu.V. Semenova
      Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications.2021; 21: 100743.     CrossRef
    • Applicability of pain neuroscience education: Where are we now?
      Valerio Barbari, Lorenzo Storari, Filippo Maselli, Marco Testa
      Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.2021; 34(4): 511.     CrossRef
    • Testing Meldonium: Assessing Soviet pragmatic alternatives to the randomized controlled trial
      Anastasiya Chirkova, Alexander Petrenko, Pavel Vasilyev
      Clinical Trials.2021; 18(3): 269.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Long-Term Intake of Korean Medicine on Gynecology Patients’ Livers and Kidneys; Panel Study - Focus on Before Intake, After 3, 6 Months -
      Junmo Yang, Dongmin Sung, Eu Gene Kim, Sundong Lee
      Journal of Korean Medicine.2020; 41(1): 84.     CrossRef
    • A Systematic Review of Academic Discourse Interventions for School-Aged Children With Language-Related Learning Disabilities
      Amy K. Peterson, Carly B. Fox, Megan Israelsen
      Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools.2020; 51(3): 866.     CrossRef
    • Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
      Tong J. Gan, Kumar G. Belani, Sergio Bergese, Frances Chung, Pierre Diemunsch, Ashraf S. Habib, Zhaosheng Jin, Anthony L. Kovac, Tricia A. Meyer, Richard D. Urman, Christian C. Apfel, Sabry Ayad, Linda Beagley, Keith Candiotti, Marina Englesakis, Traci L.
      Anesthesia & Analgesia.2020; 131(2): 411.     CrossRef
    • Physiotherapy Over a Distance
      Deepti Aggarwal, Bernd Ploderer, Thuong Hoang, Frank Vetere, Mark Bradford
      ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare.2020; 1(4): 1.     CrossRef
    • A Qualitative Market Analysis Applied to Mini-FLOTAC and Fill-FLOTAC for Diagnosis of Helminth Infections in Ruminants
      Maria Paola Maurelli, Oliva Maria Dourado Martins, Eric R. Morgan, Johannes Charlier, Giuseppe Cringoli, Teresa Letra Mateus, Bogdan Bacescu, Christophe Chartier, Edwin Claerebout, Theo de Waal, Christina Helm, Hubertus Hertzberg, Barbara Hinney, Johan Hö
      Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of a Multimodal Digital Psychotherapy Platform for Adult Depression: A Naturalistic Feasibility Study
      Enitan T Marcelle, Laura Nolting, Stephen P Hinshaw, Adrian Aguilera
      JMIR mHealth and uHealth.2019; 7(1): e10948.     CrossRef
    • Nutrition in the digital age - How digital tools can help to solve the personalized nutrition conundrum
      M. Michel, A. Burbidge
      Trends in Food Science & Technology.2019; 90: 194.     CrossRef
    • Developing an Evaluation Framework for Parent Education and Training in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Results of a Multi-stakeholder Process
      John-Joe Dawson-Squibb, Petrus J. de Vries
      Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.2019; 49(11): 4468.     CrossRef
    • Paris MEM: a study protocol for an effectiveness and efficiency trial on the treatment of traumatic stress in France after the 2015–16 terrorist attacks
      A. Brunet, A. Ayrolles, L. Gambotti, R. Maatoug, C. Estellat, M. Descamps, N. Girault, K. Kalalou, G. Abgrall, F. Ducrocq, G. Vaiva, N. Jaafari, M. O. Krebs, E. Castaigne, I. Hanafy, M. Benoit, S. Mouchabac, M. C. Cabié, O. Guillin, F. Hodeib, I. Durand-Z
      BMC Psychiatry.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Efficacy, Safety and Long-term Outcomes of Nicorandil Use in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease According to the Results of Randomized and Observational Studies
      Yu. V. Lukina, N. P. Kutishenko, S. Yu. Martsevich
      Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology.2019; 15(5): 641.     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of the Diagnose-Intervene- Verify-Adjust (DIVA) model for integrated primary healthcare planning and performance improvement: an embedded mixed methods evaluation in Kaduna state, Nigeria
      Ejemai Amaize Eboreime, Nonhlanhla Nxumalo, Rohit Ramaswamy, Latifat Ibisomi, Nnenna Ihebuzor, John Eyles
      BMJ Open.2019; 9(3): e026016.     CrossRef
    • Evaluating the Use of a Computerized CBT Program for Outpatients on a Waitlist in a University CBT Unit
      ROSANNE VILLEMAIRE-KRAJDEN, GAIL MYHR
      Journal of Psychiatric Practice.2019; 25(4): 268.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    Efficacy versus Effectiveness
    Korean J Fam Med. 2013;34(4):227-227.   Published online July 24, 2013
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Efficacy versus Effectiveness
    Korean J Fam Med. 2013;34(4):227-227.   Published online July 24, 2013
    Close
    Efficacy versus Effectiveness
    Efficacy versus Effectiveness
    TOP