Korean J Fam Med Search


Korean J Fam Med > Volume 43(1); 2022 > Article
Choi and Kang: Concurrence of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Its Associated Factors in Korean Couples



This study evaluated the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk factors associated with H. pylori transmission among spouses.


We assessed the spousal concurrence of H. pylori infection using the Campylobacter-like organism (CLO) test under gastro-endoscopy in 132 couples. Based on the CLO test results, participants were categorized into H. pylori concurrent and independent groups. The chi-square test and Student t-test were performed for demographic comparisons between the concurrent and independent H. pylori groups. In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with concurrent H. pylori infection.


The study revealed that the concurrence rate of H. pylori infection was 42.4% in married Korean couples. The odds ratio (OR) derived from the concurrence of H. pylori infection tended to decrease in older couples (OR, 0.975; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.949–1.002; P=0.072). Gastric erosion was also associated with a decreased OR for concurrent infection (OR, 0.488; 95% CI, 0.295–0.808; P=0.005). Conversely, active duodenal ulcers were associated with an increased OR for concurrent infections (OR, 6.501; 95% CI, 1.267–33.346; P=0.025). Duodenal ulcer scars tended to increase the OR of concurrent infections (OR, 1.392; 95% CI, 0.815–2.380; P=0.226).


Spousal transmission and concurrence of H. pylori infection were negatively associated with gastric erosion; however, they were positively associated with active duodenal ulcers. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these findings.


Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative bacillus that exists between the gastric mucous layer and the gastric epithelial cells [1]. This bacillus is considered a major cause of various gastrointestinal diseases such as gastritis, gastric and duodenal ulcers, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer. Globally, approximately 4.4 billion individuals developed H. pylori infection in 2015 [2]. In Korea, the number of individuals with H. pylori infection was estimated to be 13,571,123, with a prevalence rate of 54.0% in 2015 [2].
A myriad of factors, including low socioeconomic status and poor hygiene, are associated with H. pylori infection [3]. However, the modes of transmission of H. pylori are still poorly understood. Person-to-person contact (fecal-oral and oral-oral) is considered the most common route of infection [4,5]; however, the disease may also be transmitted through contaminated water [4,5], animal reservoirs [4,5], and other environmental factors [4,5]. In addition, differences in patterns of household transmission and infection rates of H. pylori among geographic regions make it difficult to clearly determine the exact pathways of H. pylori infection.
Although parent-to-child transmission is the most common occurrence, conjugal transmission also plays a significant role in intra-familial transmission. An accumulating body of evidence indicates that H. pylori infection in one spouse is a major source of spread to other household members [6]. Singh et al. [6] showed that the infection rate in spouses of H. pylori-positive individuals was significantly higher than that in H. pylori-negative spouses. Similarly, previous studies also support that the presence of an H. pylori-positive spouse is an independent risk factor for H. pylori infection in the other partner [7,8].
Despite the existing pool of evidence, it remains uncertain which specific factors are associated with the conjugal transmission of H. pylori, especially in Korean adults. Therefore, the present study evaluated the prevalence of H. pylori infection and the risk factors associated with concurrent H. pylori infection among spouses.


1. Study Population

We screened 4,583 individuals who underwent the Campylobacterlike organism (CLO) test under gastroscopy at Kosin University Gospel Hospital from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, to identify eligible participants. Among them, 4,319 individuals were excluded from the analysis: (1) individuals whose spouses did not have a record of undergoing a CLO test and those with a difference of 30 days or more in the dates that the person and their spouse performed their respective CLO tests (N=4,143); (2) individuals who had taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, bismuth compounds, and mucosal protective drugs that may affect the CLO test results within the last three months of testing (N=114); and (3) individuals who were H. pylori-negative in the CLO test for themselves and their spouses (N=62).
Following extensive screening, 264 participants (132 couples) were included in the final analysis.
The eligible participants were then classified into two groups: group A (the husband and wife were both H. pylori-positive [concurrence group]) and group B (only one spouse was H. pylori-positive [independence group]). The flow chart for the selection of the study participants is shown in Figure 1.
The requirement for informed consent from individual patients was waived because of the retrospective design of this study. All study protocols complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kosin University Medical School (KUGH-2020-05-003).

2. Helicobacter pylori Tests

The participants underwent gastroscopy to confirm the presence of H. pylori-associated esophagogastroduodenal disease, and biopsies were obtained for the CLO test. After an overnight fast, the participants underwent gastroscopy with lidocaine administered as local anesthetic throughout the throat area. Some participants who needed conscious sedation were administered intravenous midazolam. Biopsy specimens were obtained from each participant’s gross lesions in the stomach and duodenum using biopsy forceps. Tissues were cultured in a CLO test kit (Delta West, Bentley, Australia), and the results were read within 2 hours. If the color of the culture medium changed from yellow to red, it was considered H. pylori-positive; however, if it remained yellow, the finding was considered negative. In particular, whenever a negative result was acquired within the 2 hours, the final reading was performed again after 24 hours.

3. Data Collection and Measurements

Information on demographic variables (age), socioeconomic status (education and occupation), lifestyle habits (smoking status and alcohol consumption), and gastrointestinal symptoms were obtained using a self-administered questionnaire at the time of visit for their health check-up. Upon consideration of aspects such as educational qualification (high school and college or higher), occupation (manual workers: fishermen, armed forces personnel, technical workers, production workers, and construction workers; non-manual workers: housewives, managers, service and sales workers, religious workers, politicians, medical workers, transport workers, white-collar workers, education workers, and unemployed individuals), smoking status (non-smokers: never and ex-smokers; and smokers: current smokers), and alcohol consumption status, the participants were categorized into two groups. Participants were then asked to report any gastrointestinal symptoms (including nausea, epigastric soreness, indigestion) they were experiencing at the time of the examination. Body weight and height were measured automatically, and the body mass index was calculated as body mass in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared.
Lipid profiles (total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) were obtained using enzymatic methods after at least 8 hours of fasting. Data on hypertension and diabetes were obtained from the medical records. Finally, the endoscopic findings were determined by combining the gross findings of the operator and the histological results after specimen collection.

4. Statistical Analysis

The chi-square test and Student t-test were performed to determine the demographic comparison between the concurrent and independent H. pylori groups. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify numerous factors (occupation, age, body mass index, education level, physical labor, smoking history, drinking history, hypertension history, diabetes mellitus history, digestive symptoms, and endoscopy findings) associated with concurrent H. pylori infection. All statistical analyses were done using IBM SPSS Statistics software ver. 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was set at a two-tailed P-value of <0.05.


The study showed that the concurrence rate of H. pylori infection was 42.4% in married Korean couples. Table 1 presents a comparison of the general characteristics between the concurrent and independent groups. The mean ages of the independent and concurrent groups were 49.7±10.6 years and 47.1±10.3 years, respectively. Gastric erosion was also found to be higher in the independent group (66.5%) than in the concurrent group (48.2%). There were no significant differences in other characteristics, such as age, socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and biochemical variables between the two groups.
Table 2 shows the general characteristics associated with concurrent H. pylori infections. General characteristics were not significantly associated with the conjugal infection of H. pylori.
We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to test the gastrointestinal symptoms and endoscopic findings associated with concurrent H. pylori infections (Table 3). Gastric erosion was associated with a decreased odds ratio (OR) for concurrent infections (OR, 0.488; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.295–0.808; P=0.005). In contrast, active duodenal ulcers were associated with an increased OR for concurrent infections (OR, 6.501; 95% CI, 1.267–33.346; P=0.025). Although the presence of a duodenal ulcer scar tended to increase the OR of concurrent infections (OR, 1.392; 95% CI, 0.815–2.380; P=0.226).


This study showed that concurrent H. pylori infection was observed in 42.4% of married Korean couples. In the analysis of the factors associated with the concurrence of H. pylori infection in Korean adults, the presence of an active duodenal ulcer was associated with an increased risk of conjugal infection with H. pylori. However, duodenal ulcer scars were not associated with concurrent H. pylori infection. In addition, gastric erosion was inversely associated with H. pylori concurrence.
The concurrence rate of H. pylori infection among spouses varies among the existing studies. In a UK study, 18.6% of patients in the concurrent group among 102 couples had at least one spouse with H. pylori infection [9]. The H. pylori infection concurrence rate was 33.3% in a German study [7], which was slightly lower than that in the present study. However, in an Italian study involving 161 participants, the prevalence of H. pylori concurrent infection was 74.5% [10]. Additionally, the concurrence rate of H. pylori was 75% among 25 Indian couples, which was much higher than in the current study [6]. Although the reason for these discrepancies remains unclear, it is suggested that both a heterogeneous study design and population contribute to the inconsistencies among studies worldwide.
An active duodenal ulcer was associated with an increased risk of conjugal H. pylori infection; however, duodenal ulcer scars were not associated with concurrent H. pylori infections. Because H. pylori infection is a well-known independent risk factor for active duodenal ulcers [11-14], it can be inferred that participants with active duodenal ulcers had higher bacterial loads than participants free from duodenal ulcers. As a result, a partner of a patient diagnosed with a duodenal ulcer was more likely to be infected with H. pylori originating from his or her spouse. Moreover, our finding that duodenal ulcer scars were not associated with concurrent H. pylori infection indirectly supports the requirement for a distinct bacterial load to manifest spousal transmission and infection with H. pylori. However, we were unable to verify the exact transmission pathway of H. pylori or DNA types of H. pylori; therefore, further studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this association.
Our study also showed that gastric erosion was inversely associated with concurrent H. pylori infection. However, previous studies evaluating the relationship between H. pylori infection and gastric erosion have reported inconsistent results. For instance, a study in Japan reported that H. pylori affects the progression of gastric precancerous lesions, glandular atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia in patients with gastric erosion [15]. In contrast, another study concluded that no significant relationship exists between H. pylori gastritis and gastric erosion [16].
While concurrent H. pylori infections were positively associated with the presence of an active duodenal ulcer, gastric erosion showed a negative association. Although it is difficult to explain the inverse association between H. pylori infection and duodenal ulcers and gastric erosion, several mechanisms have been hypothesized. First, the difference in intragastric acidity between erosive gastritis and H. pylori infection might play a role in this outcome. Erosive gastritis is linked to intragastric hyperacidity, whereas chronic H. pylori infection leads to an intragastric hypoacidic state by impairing the secretion of gastric acid, especially in the antrum [17]. Considering that hyperacidity causes erosion of gastric surfaces, it is plausible to infer that erosive gastritis is less likely to occur in the presence of a chronic H. pylori infection, which is associated with decreased intragastric acidity. In a previous study, H. pylori infection did not show any predisposition to erosive gastritis [18]. Another possible explanation is that people with an H. pylori infection are more likely to take anti-acids, such as protein pump inhibitors, to control gastrointestinal symptoms. Therefore, a low prevalence of gastric erosion may be observed among the members of the concurrent H. pylori infection group. Furthermore, other factors, such as psychological and physiological stress caused by erosive gastritis, may influence the manifestation of this finding.
Overall, this study has several limitations. First, since this study was conducted as a cross-sectional study, caution must be exercised when drawing conclusions regarding the causality of exposure and outcome. Moreover, as the study population was solely composed of Korean patients who underwent health check-ups, the observed findings may not be generalizable to other populations. Third, there was no evaluation of the ribosomal RNA gene patterns of H. pylori strains, so the spousal concurrence of H. pylori strains could not be verified. Finally, information on previous H. pylori eradication and the forms of physical contact between spouses that could possibly influence the concurrence of infection were not accounted for in the analysis owing to the lack of existing data. However, this study is the first to estimate the factors associated with concurrent H. pylori infections among Korean spouses.
In conclusion, spousal transmission and the concurrence of H. pylori infections were negatively associated with age and gastric erosion; however, they showed a positive correlation with duodenal ulcers. These results were consistent, even after correcting for age. This can be seen as a meaningful result because it elucidates spousal transmission of the disease, given that H. pylori-positive spouses act as a risk factor for spousal concurrence. Further studies are needed to determine the role of spousal transmission in intrafamilial transmission of H. pylori infection and the greater risk factors for spousal concurrence.



No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figure. 1.
Flow diagram for study participants. CLO test, Campylobacter-like organism test.
Table 1.
General characteristics of participants
Characteristic Total participants (n=264) Independence H. pylori infection (n=152) Concurrence H. pylori infection (n=112) P-value*
Age (y) 48.6±10.5 49.7±10.6 47.1±10.3 0.069
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.8±3.4 22.6±2.8 25.0±3.6 0.595
Education 0.599
High school 22 (8.3) 11 (7.2) 11 (9.8)
College or above 242 (91.7) 141 (92.8) 101 (90.2)
Occupation 0.268
Non-manual workers 210 (79.5) 125 (82.2) 85 (75.9)
Manual workers 54 (20.5) 27 (17.8) 27 (24.1)
Alcohol consumption 1.000
No 101 (38.3) 58 (38.2) 43 (38.4)
Yes 163 (61.7) 94 (61.8) 69 (61.6)
Smoking 0.927
Non-smokers 168 (63.6) 98 (64.5) 70 (62.5)
Smokers 96 (36.4) 54 (35.5) 42 (37.5)
Endoscopic findings
Gastric erosion 155 (58.7) 101 (66.5) 54 (48.2) 0.004
Non-atropic gastritis 103 (39.0) 60 (39.5) 43 (38.4) 0.960
Atropic gastritis 142 (53.8) 76 (50.0) 66 (58.9) 0.189
Gastric polyp 16 (6.1) 9 (5.9) 7 (6.3) 1.000
Reflux esophagitis 75 (28.4) 48 (31.6) 27 (24.1) 0.233
Gastric benign tumor 3 (1.1) 1 (0.7) 2 (1.8) 0.789
Gastric malignancy 3 (1.1) 1 (1.3) 2 (1.8) 1.000
Gastric ulcer 70 (26.5) 43 (28.3) 27 (24.1) 0.535
Active duodenal ulcer 9 (3.4) 2 (1.3) 7 (6.3) 0.066
Duodenal ulcer scar 164 (62.1) 91 (59.9) 73 (65.2) 0.453
Gastrointestinal symptoms
Nausea 13 (4.9) 9 (5.9) 4 (3.6) 0.559
Epigastric soreness 28 (10.6) 17 (11.2) 11 (9.8) 0.878
Indigestion 44 (16.7) 25 (16.5) 19 (17.0) 1.000
Weight loss 5 (1.9) 3 (2.0) 2 (1.8) 1.000
Concomitant diseases
Hypertension 64 (24.2) 48 (31.6) 16 (14.3) 0.263
Diabetes mellitus 32 (12.1) 21 (13.8) 11 (9.8) 0.743
Blood lab
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 196.2±44.9 193.7±41.7 199.6±49.1 0.295
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 121.1±138.0 110.7±65.9 135.3±197.6 0.209
HDL-C (mg/dL) 54.7±14.5 54.5±15.1 55.0±13.7 0.747
LDL-C (mg/dL) 121.2±37.6 121.0±39.2 121.6±35.8 0.904

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

* Calculated using Student T-test for continuous variable and chi-square test for categorical variable.

Table 2.
General factors associated with concurrent Helicobacter pylori infection among spouses
Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) P-value* OR (95% CI) P-value*
Age (y) 0.978 (0.956–1.002) 0.070 0.975 (0.949–1.002) 0.072
Body mass index 1.019 (0.950–1.094) 0.594 1.011 (0.031–1.097) 0.802
Education 0.454 0.132
High school Reference Reference
College or above 1.396 (0.583–3.345) 2.108 (0.798–5.568)
Occupation 0.208 0.283
Non-manual workers Reference Reference
Manual workers 0.680 (0.373–1.240) 0.683 (0.340–1.370)
Alcohol consumption 0.969 0.477
No Reference Reference
Yes 1.010 (0.611–1.669) 1.265 (0.663–2.413)
Smoking 0.742 1.028
Non-smoker Reference Reference
Smokers 1.089 (0.656–1.807) 1.028 (0.517–2.047)
Hypertension 0.202 0.211
No Reference Reference
Yes 1.537 (0.794–2.975) 1.625 (0.760–3.475)
Diabetes mellitus 0.584 0.616
No Reference Reference
Yes 0.787 (0.334–1.855) 0.787 (0.309–2.004)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

* Calculated using single and multiple logistic regression.

Table 3.
Gastro-intestinal symptoms and endoscopic findings associated with concurrent Helicobacter pylori infection among spouses
Variable Multivariate analysis
Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value*
Gastrointestinal symptoms
 Nausea 0.589 (0.176–1.970) 0.390
 Epigastric soreness 0.893 (0.399–1.999) 0.784
 Indigestion 0.914 (0.466–1.793) 0.795
 Weight loss 0.897 (0.146–5.508) 0.907
Endoscopic findings
 Gastric erosion 0.488 (0.295–0.808) 0.005
 Non-atropic gastritis 1.208 (0.691–2.112) 0.508
 Atropic gastritis 1.245 (0.731–2.123) 0.420
 Gastric polyp 1.175 (0.418–3.306) 0.759
 Reflux esophagitis 0.692 (0.397–1.205) 0.193
 Gastric benign tumor 3.695 (0.320–42.657) 0.295
 Gastric malignancy 1.588 (0.217–11.612) 0.649
 Gastric ulcer 0.895 (0.504–1.589) 0.704
 Active duodenal ulcer 6.501 (1.267–33.346) 0.025
 Duodenal ulcer scar 1.392 (0.815–2.380) 0.226

Adjusted for age.

CI, confidence interval.

* Calculated using multiple logistic regression.


1. Kusters JG, van Vliet AH, Kuipers EJ. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:449-90.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. Hooi JK, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MM, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta- analysis. Gastroenterology 2017;153:420-9.
crossref pmid
3. Graham DY. History of Helicobacter pylori, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:5191-204.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Magalhaes Queiroz DM, Luzza F. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2006;11 Suppl 1:1-5.
crossref pmid
5. Delport W, van der Merwe SW. The transmission of Helicobacter pylori: the effects of analysis method and study population on inference. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2007;21:215-36.
crossref pmid
6. Singh V, Trikha B, Vaiphei K, Nain CK, Thennarasu K, Singh K. Helicobacter pylori: evidence for spouse-to-spouse transmission. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;14:519-22.
crossref pmid
7. Brenner H, Rothenbacher D, Bode G, Dieudonne P, Adler G. Active infection with Helicobacter pylori in healthy couples. Epidemiol Infect 1999;122:91-5.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Brenner H, Weyermann M, Rothenbacher D. Clustering of Helicobacter pylori infection in couples: differences between high- and lowprevalence population groups. Ann Epidemiol 2006;16:516-20.
crossref pmid
9. Stone MA, Taub N, Barnett DB, Mayberry JF. Increased risk of infection with Helicobacter pylori in spouses of infected subjects: observations in a general population sample from the UK. Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:433-6.
10. Sgambato D, Visciola G, Ferrante E, Miranda A, Romano L, Tuccillo C, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in sexual partners of H. pylori-infected subjects: role of gastroesophageal reflux. United European Gastroenterol J 2018;6:1470-6.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Hopkins RJ, Girardi LS, Turney EA. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori eradication and reduced duodenal and gastric ulcer recurrence: a review. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1244-52.
crossref pmid
12. Parente F, Maconi G, Sangaletti O, Minguzzi M, Vago L, Rossi E, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and related gastroduodenal lesions in spouses of Helicobacter pylori positive patients with duodenal ulcer. Gut 1996;39:629-33.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Hopkins RJ, Morris JG Jr. Helicobacter pylori: the missing link in perspective. Am J Med 1994;97:265-77.
crossref pmid
14. Graham DY. Campylobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease. Gastroenterology 1989;96(2 Pt 2 Suppl):615-25.
crossref pmid
15. Zhang C, Yamada N, Wu YL, Wen M, Matsuhisa T, Matsukura N. Helicobacter pylori infection, glandular atrophy and intestinal metaplasia in superficial gastritis, gastric erosion, erosive gastritis, gastric ulcer and early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:791-6.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Maguilnik I, Neumann WL, Sonnenberg A, Genta RM. Reactive gastropathy is associated with inflammatory conditions throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;36:736-43.
crossref pmid
17. Lee SY. Endoscopic gastritis, serum pepsinogen assay, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Korean J Intern Med 2016;31:835-44.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Kate V, Ananthakrishnan N, Badrinath S, Amarnath SK, Balamurugan M, Ratnakar C. Helicobacter pylori infection and erosive gastritis. J Assoc Physicians India 1998;46:436-7.


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
Room 2003, Gwanghwamun Officia, 92 Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03186, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3210-1537    Tax: +82-2-3210-1538    E-mail: kjfm@kafm.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Academy of Family Medicine.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next